Sarah Braasch to participate in “The Call,” a new documentary by C-Line Films

Filmmaker Chico Colvard, courtesy C-Line Films

Filmmaker Chico Colvard accidentally shot his sister in the leg when he was a 10 year old boy. His sister, fearing she was going to die, blurted out that she and their other two sisters were being molested by their father. This set in motion a chain of events that Colvard’s first major film, “Family Affair,” documents over a multi-year period.

Chico Colvard and co-producer Madison O’Leary are currently working on a new documentary with the working title “The Call: America’s Gilded Age of Grievance.” The film will explore the topic of phone calls to police and their different, and sometimes very tragic, outcomes. 

One of the subjects of the film will be Yale University Ph.D. candidate Sarah Braasch, who was depicted in the international media as a racist cop caller in what is now known as the “Napping While Black” incident. (If you are unfamiliar with Braasch’s story, a background link is below.) 

Sarah Braasch, Portrayed as Racist Cop Caller at Yale, Debuts YouTube Channel

In an interview with Craig Phillips for PBS’s Independent Lens collection,  Colvard says:

“THE CALL: America’s Gilded Age of Grievance examines 911 calls that range from acts of white supremacy to displays of implicit bias and genuine concerns about suspicious behavior framed by roiling racial divides. By inviting to the conversation racial justice experts, dispatchers, law enforcement, victim/survivors and the ever-elusive callers cloaked in veils of anonymity, this project synthesizes the 911 epidemic in America’s ‘New Jim Crow.’ As with any story, the ‘truth’ is elusive. Shifting memories are compromised by implicit bias, fear and trauma. The goal is not to endorse or refute the participants’ agendas, but to expose epistemic habits and emotional dispositions that shape how we understand ‘us,’ ‘them,’ and the world around us.”

Subjects of “The Call” will include: 

Corey Lewis, made famous for “Babysitting While Black,” when a woman called the police while two children were in his care. Lewis runs an after-school program and camp for children in Marietta, Georgia.

Marc Peeples, a Detroit, Michigan native who established a community garden on an abandoned lot. In a rather complicated case, three neighborhood women repeatedly called the police accusing Peeples of a variety of misdeeds which eventually resulted in his arrest on allegations of stalking. All charges were ultimately dismissed. The incident became known as “Gardening While Black.”

Blake Murphy, a medical student, who called police when she thought she saw a man breaking into a car in Evanston, Illinois. The man turned out to be a Ph.D. candidate at Northwestern University getting into his own car. However, local police pursued him as he drove away and Murphy’s own dash camera caught officers violently taking him to the ground.

Stephon Clark, who was shot and killed in his grandmother’s backyard in Sacramento, California, when police responded to a report of someone smashing car windows and stealing loose items. Clark was shot dead when police mistook his cell phone for a gun. His family continues to pursue justice against Sacramento Police Department.

Sarah Braasch, known internationally in the “Napping While Black” incident, who is currently working on her dissertation from Yale University. Braasch has two engineering degrees from the University of Minnesota, a JD from Fordham University and is a member of the New York State Bar. Braasch has petitioned the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission to release the Yale Police Department bodycam footage from the incident. To date, the YPD refuses to release the video to the public.

Colvard’s films have a unique quality as he is able to view situations as more complex than they may appear on the surface. “Family Affair” and his second film “Black Memorabilia,” surprise the viewer by approaching taboo topics with a subtle sense of duality.

After Colvard shot his sister and she disclosed the molestation by their father, his father was arrested and sent to prison, the parents divorced, and the children were torn apart and farmed out to relatives. Colvard cut off any relationship with his father for years, but his sisters ultimately formed a new and different relationship with their father.

“Family Affair” thus documents the aftermath of this tragedy and Colvard’s deeper understanding of how this family attempted to put itself back together. Colvard writes, “Family Affair does not attempt to mitigate the long-term dysfunctional impact of incest. Instead, this documentary reshapes the commonly held view that molesters are pushed to the margins of society, never to reconnect with their victim/survivors. In the end, the film focuses on the motives, accommodations and levels of forgiveness survivors make in order to maintain some semblance of family.”

Colvard’s goal is to move beyond the obvious, taking the viewer along on a ride that is complex and emotional. He writes, “At first, this documentary ran the risk of turning into a crude indictment of my father, a figure the audience is sure to view as a ‘monster’. While that assessment might be unavoidable, I do not want the audience to only view him or other pedophiles as a one-dimensional ‘monster-like’ figure.”

More recently, Colvard made the film “Black Memorabilia,” featured as part of PBS’s Independent Films collection. Again, the film is more than a simple indictment. In his director’s statement, Colvard writes, “The goal of the film is not to demonize or blame the people that hold these objects dear, but to understand the context and background in which they came to know them. Often times black memorabilia is seen as a connection to family, heritage and ‘the good old days’ of one’s childhood. In many cases these objects aren’t even considered hateful, but rather historical or even cute.”

Again, confronting a taboo topic, the film’s goal is to educate and open a difficult discussion. In a synopsis of “Black Memorabilia,” the producers explain: “In the midst of the roiling ethnic unrest in the US today, the film’s confrontation of our feelings about these objects strikes at the heart of a pressing contemporary issue and opens a unique dialogue about the continuing legacy of racism in America.”

Chico Colvard teaches Race, Law and Media related courses in the Boston area. He was the Founding Curator of the UMB Film Series. Chico is the founding member of C-LineFilms.

Madison O’Leary is a Boston-based producer. She received her BA in Communications from UMass Amherst. After working around the country as a Trauma and Abuse Counselor in federal prisons, she came on to work as an Assistant Producer and Researcher on FAMILY AFFAIR (Sundance, 2010). She worked as a Producer on BLACK MEMORABILIA (MoMA 2018) and currently heads-up operations at C-LineFilms, LLC. 

C-LineFilms is an independent storytelling group committed to social justice documentaries. Their work screens globally at festivals, museums, broadcasts and online platforms. C-Line aims to partner with college/universities, libraries, grassroots organizations and community allies to raise awareness, provoke meaningful conversations, stimulate syllabi and enhance professional development.

 

For more about C-Line Films, visit https://www.c-linefilms.org/

For more about Sarah Braasch’s FOIA request to the Yale Police Department and the Yale investigation, visit

Sarah Braasch, Yale University, Investigation of Bias and How a Similar Incident at Smith College was Resolved

The Dissident Right: What is it and why should we care?

In my ongoing research on Antifascism and NeoFascism in the U.S., I have had contact with certain white identity Twitter accounts who are quite open about their beliefs. I decided I would monitor them for a bit just to get a feel for what they talk about, and in the network I follow, it’s pretty easy to detect the overriding ideology.

These are not the same people that “troll” or “meme” on chan boards. In fact, they present themselves as well read (although reading choices are selective) and consider themselves to be intellectuals, strategizers and gentle recruiters through information sharing.

Like-minded white nationalists sometimes label themselves “Right Dissidents” or part of the “Dissident Movement.” These dissidents seem to be what’s left of a discontented alt-right, former followers of Richard Spencer, which they now consider to have been a failed movement. For his part, Spencer dismisses the dissident right as not much more than a trollish spectacle of edgy conservatives.

Within this loosely knit ideology, President Donald Trump is considered to be a complete and utter disappointment, having promised to deport all illegal immigrants. In addition, they find his friendliness with Israel to be extremely troublesome. They view Trump supporters as potential recruits and would certainly like to have them on their team, but Trump supporters are not part of the “Dissident Movement.” Generally, they consider Trump supporters to be old-fashioned, hard-working and good and honest conservatives–but not dissidents.

Similary, this “movement” disdains the GOP as they assert it will facilitate a Non-White USA if a high skill immigration policy is put into place. Why? Because, according to the “dissidents,” the white doctor/lawyer class will be replaced. They believe the ultimate goal of such a policy is to make white people completely dependent on everyone else by reducing whites down to a powerless working class people.

“Right Dissidents” talk very seriously about how to reorganize politically, perhaps on an international scale, with other white nationalists who believe in the value of a white ethnostate. They brainstorm about how to fundraise and how to find back-up platforms in the event they lose any they now have. They hope for a legitimate political party and sophisticated candidate of their own in the U.S., while also considering the possibility of moving beyond isolationist nationalism and gathering strength on the world stage.

In a recent piece for Truthout, counter-far right researcher and activist Spencer Sunshine, PhD, observes that “the revived white nationalist movement has split into different wings. One wants to go mainstream, while the militants are promoting a campaign of terror.” 

The Right Dissidents active on Twitter are reflective of the mainstreamers, those who want to organize politically and not through violent means–but continue to spread these elaborate conspiracy theories that can inspire actual violence. Sunshine warns that the more militant groups are now reorganizing on the Telegram app, where content is not regulated.

And most disturbingly, a large part of what they talk about is Jews.

Imagine a worldview in which Judaism is a fake religion used as a cover for a global elite to infiltrate each country one at a time until ultimately they achieve global domination. 

Some believe it is already too late in the U.S.–the “Jewish Masters” are already in control of the West, and are moving on to infiltrate India (they’ve already infiltrated Bollywood) and China will be next.

Adherents refer frequently to “ZOG.” According to the ADL, “ZOG is a white supremacist acronym for ‘Zionist Occupied Government,’ which reflects the common white supremacist belief that the U.S. government is controlled by Jews.”

The “Right Dissidents” believe Jewish people have some sort of supernatural mind control abilities. This ability is the equivalent of a Weapon of Mass Destruction. They believe some of this mind control is observable, such as the way Jews are the producers of pop rap music that is listened to by Third World Immigrants living in the U.S. Belief in Jewish control of the media and entertainment industry contributes to the brainwashing. They call it a “mindfuck.”

Within this belief system, Jews are behind the flooding of Europe with immigrants. Within this ideology, this is a distraction strategically employed by Israel and the Jews in order to achieve their ultimate goal, which besides world domination, is the extinction of white people. 

Likewise, they suggest Jews and Israel are behind much of the  immigration to the U.S., especially encouraging Third World Immigration and granting asylum to refugees. In fact, according to them, Bari Weiss admitted as much in an NPR interview

Why do the Jews do this? 

Within this belief system, Jews are not white, and hope to propel the white race into extinction through this constant flood of refugees and immigrants. This will help them to blend into society unnoticed and fulfill their prophecy.

Some of the “Right Dissidents” are also “truthers,” believing the Holocaust (they say there is no evidence except three people were tortured into a false confession) and 9/11 (they share with one another the true culprit was Israel) to be hoaxes. Some just go full on Neo-Nazi, declaring Hitler to be a great man, and becoming incensed if Trump is compared to Hitler, because Hitler was a passionate and great leader and Trump is an idiot.

Why should we care what members of fringe movements think and say?

Under normal circumstances for most of us, we are not going to encounter this kind of chat in our Twitter feeds. You have to kind of go out of your way to find it. So why is it important?

The FBI Report on Conspiracy Theories and Domestic Terrorism

In May of 2019, the FBI Phoenix Field Office issued a bulletin titled “Anti-Government, Identity Based, and Fringe Political Conspiracy Theories Very Likely Motivate Some Domestic Extremists to Commit Criminal, Sometimes Violent Activity.” 

The FBI report states that “throughout history, such conspiracy theories have fueled prejudice, witch-hunts, genocide, and acts of terrorism.”

Further, “In the context of domestic terrorism, extremists often view the activities of alleged conspirators as an existential threat that can only be stopped through drastic, or even violent means.”

So, again, why should we care about the Dissident Right? The danger lies in the real possibility that an individual or a group will resort to violence or terrorism to confront the “evil force” behind this “existential threat.”

The Dissident Right is at its core conspiratorial in nature. Butte College has published a handy Tip Sheet titled “Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracism.” 

According to the Tip Sheet, “The comfort of conspiracy theory is that it provides a well-defined enemy and a sense of control (or at least structure) in the face of upheaval and disempowerment; the tendency to perceive conspiracy is more common in groups experiencing social isolation or political marginalization. The freedom fighters of conspiracy theory need not see themselves as being at the mercy of irresistible, inexplicable, or random natural or social forces, but as soldiers in a just cause.”

Upheaval. Disempowerment. Social isolation. Political marginalization. Let’s take a look more closely at the Dissident Right with respect to these societal triggers.

UPHEAVAL: The Great Replacement, or Slow White Genocide

The “Dissident Right” claims the U.S. is a white homeland not because whites were here first, but because they are descendants of the builder race. They believe racism is now a weaponized word used to make whites believe that any preference for their own kind is inherently evil. However, they assert, in-group preference is natural and healthy, so it is therefore noble to try and preserve an endangered species.

“Right Dissidents” offer a variety of “scientific facts” to support their belief system, and if there is any alternative information, it is easily dismissed as propaganda because only low-IQ people will fall for these lies.

DISEMPOWERMENT: “The Anti-White Agenda” or “The War on Whites”

Presumably, since “Right Dissidents” believe Jews run academia and the media, the anti-white agenda is purposeful and targeted. (The roots of these conspiracy theories may be found in a fraudulent document called “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” forged in 1897.) 

In addition, the “Dissident Right” claims Jews are perceived to be behind any tension that exists between blacks and whites in order to sow societal discontent. They complain that white people are sick of being lectured about white privilege because the real privilege in society is elite privilege–money and power. In fact, they are happy to report black separatists and black nationalists are on the same page as the white nationalists and could even join up with white nationalists to advance the ideal of an ethnostate–a segregated ethnostate, of course.

SOCIAL ISOLATION

“Dissident Right” enthusiasts complain of an anti-white male agenda where men are portrayed as predators to be profiled and feared. They espouse outdated ideas about the role of women, preferring females return to childbearing and homemaking to stabilize society. Women have been “pozzed” (an alt-right term for cultural and societal degeneracy), especially by universities. (Remember, Jews are controlling academia.)

The epitome of social isolation is seen in incels, or involuntary celibates, who feel they are nice guys being rejected by women as a direct result of extreme feminism and this all-pervasive anti-male agenda. At school, in the media, and on social media men are being taught they are toxic, good-for-nothing idiots. 

POLITICAL MARGINALIZATION

Right Dissidents feel stigmatized and victimized. They believe the Alt-Right made progress but it wasn’t aggressive enough. Right dissidents complain deplatforming has slowed their progress and troll culture has made them look bad. They hope to complete what the alt-right tried to start, finding a solid leader and formalizing a party. Then they can begin to attract more to the movement, beginning with conservatives and libertarians.

What can we do?

Conspiracy theories are not a new phenomenon–they have always been with us, but the rapid proliferation was not. With the powerful growth of social media, the ease with which conspiracy theories may be shared and promoted, sometimes even disguised as legitimate news sources, the problem is on the rise.

However, there are always those that may be on the fence–dabbling in conspiracy theories, but not yet wholly committed. These are the people we may be able to sway through facts–the problem is how.

Education and Social Media

Many conspiracy theories are harmless. If Elvis and Tupac are still alive, this is not going to inspire domestic terror. If Keanu Reeves is immortal, good for him! 

Social media echo chambers contribute to the problem. In a 2018 BBC article titled “The Enduring Appeal of Conspiracy Theories,” author Melissa Hogenboom writes, “we live in a polarised world. One study looking at how conspiracy theories spread online, revealed that there is no overlap between those who share scientific news, and those who share conspiracies or fake news.”

While social media companies have tried various attempts to flag fake stories, the onus will always be on the consumer of information to make the right decisions.

Encouraging digital literacy–learning how to separate fake news from legitimate resources–should be ever more important in today’s curriculum. Understanding how to fact check from more than one source or ideally from the original source, can be a learned skill. 

Furthermore, students should understand that bias in media exists, and should know how to recognize or check that as well. A sense of becoming a good digital citizen should be valued and praised. Sharing fake news is poor digital citizenship. 

Attempts at recognizing fake news sources can be fun and engaging. Take the game Factitious, for example, available for free online. The Center for Media Literacy also offers some great resources for parents and teachers. 

Awareness and Conversation

Regardless of partisanship, we must open this conversation and familiarize ourselves with the proliferation of the more dangerous conspiracy theories, some of which have already inspired domestic terror attacks. Awareness needs to be ongoing as new conspiracies arise.

Remember this. 

“All Jews must die.” This is what the shooter reportedly yelled out as he opened fire on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in October of 2018.

And this is why it’s important and this is why we should care.

 

Is this racism? Or is this just a guy in an elevator I don’t know? #NappingWhileBlack at Yale University

Anyone following the Sarah Braasch “Napping While Black” incident at Yale University has probably heard that Braasch had indeed called the Yale Police non-emergency number a little over 2 months earlier (February 24, 2018) because of a suspicious person in her dormitory.

Braasch had observed that an unfamiliar man, who got on the elevator with her, did not have a key to operate the elevator or to enter the locked room where he said he had a meeting on the 12th Floor. In fact, this would imply the man didn’t have key access to have entered the building without an escort in the first place. Braasch confirmed that the 12th Floor meeting room he said he was looking for was locked with the lights off before returning to her dorm room, also on the 12th floor, to notify the YPD.

Braasch is currently pursuing a Freedom of Information request with the Connecticut FOI Commission asking that Yale Police release the body camera footage of a later, related encounter with the Yale Police on May 8, 2018. Yale is vigorously defending the FOIA request.

Yale University retains prominent attorney to defend FOIA request made by Yale student Sarah Braasch

More on the FOIA request and the post-hearing briefs may be found here:

Sarah Braasch, Yale University, Investigation of Bias and How a Similar Incident at Smith College was Resolved

 

Interestingly, in Yale’s post-hearing brief, they make much ado about proper access to the building and the regulations thereof.

From Yale’s brief, we are able to understand that intrusions or unauthorized access to dormitories do occasionally happen:

 

A link to Yale’s full post-hearing link may be found here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzOJKJMkQ_ajeEV0MjBVY2xlbkNSLTdpTVM5cVpwbk53TFg4/view

A link to Sarah Braasch’s post-hearing brief may be found here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzOJKJMkQ_aja1BoVUNvbjJsZFpEUXQzbHU0YVdNd2xQMlA4/view?usp=sharing

As it turns out, the man Braasch encountered on February 24, 2018 did not have proper access to the building without an escort, but once police discovered that the man was a Yale affiliate and was to be met by a resident, all was declared fine and everyone was to go about their business. Case closed, right?

Well, no. Here’s what happened next. A few days later, the man in the elevator and his host wrote a joint letter to Yale Housing Director George Longyear. In the joint letter, it was explained that the instructions to the male were to text his host upon arrival at the gate so the host could escort her guests to the 12th Floor per dormitory regulations. However, the male had gained access to the building and the elevator and was attempting to find the meeting room on his own.

The letter to Yale’s Housing Director recounts the elevator encounter from the man’s perspective, but then goes into quite a long discussion of “microaggressions and psychological violence” experienced by black students on Yale’s campus.

The letter then moves on to a discussion of lynchings for entertainment and public executions by police. Thus, the authors of the letter believe Braasch’s phone call to the non-emergency line of YPD was “an act of violence because of the history of state sanctioned executions of faultless Black men, women and children.”

The final line of the letter refers to “the context in which they are operating without making racist judgments.”

A link to the full letter may be found here. The majority of the letter was released to the public via Facebook immediately following the May 8, 2018 encounter. That post has since been deleted.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzOJKJMkQ_ajZ1V5RVlLUkVPX2piNFNnQXdQUWcxYXUxTzZN/view?usp=sharing

In an interview with CNN’s Don Lemon, the man remains convinced Braasch only called the Yale Police because he is black and was racially profiled. After the story went viral, Braasch continues to try and prove to the public that racial animus was not a motivation in asking YPD to confirm the man’s access to the dormitory.

 

Braasch plans to release additional documents in the coming days. She is also raising funds to support her legal defense against Yale Police and Yale University.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/sarah-braasch-legal-fund

Tweet others as you would like to be Tweeted: Twitter Etiquette

At the end of 2018, Sarah Haider, Executive Director of Ex-Muslims of North America, announced that she was making a New Year’s resolution on Twitter that would hopefully make her interactions with others pleasant. I liked her advice so much I saved it along with a collection of other recommendations I have read. 


Sarah Haider’s Rules:


  1. No snark ever. No liking/rting (retweeting) “dunks” (no matter how valid). 
  2. Aim for high ratio of sharing good work to criticizing bad work. 
  3. When criticizing, provide solutions or alternative.
    ———- 

The reactions to her new rules were overwhelmingly positive, but… there were many who protested the idea of “no snark.”

So what exactly is “snark”?

According to the Oxford Dictionary, the word snark dates back to 1876. It was originally coined by Lewis Carroll as a nonsense word in The Hunting of the Snark.

On Twitter, it is an informal North American term that means to make snide and sharply critical comments.

Merriam Webster defines snark as an attitude or expression of mocking irreverence and sarcasm and suggests that snark first appeared in informal use around 1999.

Urban Dictionary identifies snark as a combination of the words “snide” and “remark”. Other definitions referred to sarcastic comments that should be creative, subtle, and stabbing all at once.

Snark may be thought of as a smart ass remark or the equivalent of talking smack or dissing.

There are apparently degrees of snark. Some users describe snark as mere teasing, while others see it as more malicious. 

——

Opposition to Snark

The snark-opposition can be very strong. Some users will not tolerate it all, calling it an automatic unfollow, while others object to it on humanitarian grounds, assuming the snark comes from a troubled place.

Snark Supporters

Some find snark to be a form of correcting others because they are simply hopeless to even engage and deserve nothing more. Besides, they say, if done properly and sparingly, it simply makes Twitter more fun.

Others believe the Twitter word limit invites snark and that people who want a no-snark environment should just go back to Facebook.

————-

“Dunking” on Twitter is defined as using the “retweet with comment” function and mocking the quoted tweet.

In general, people don’t seem to mind this quite as much, probably because it is very often aimed at a public figure. If it is not a public figure, the greatest risk would be the inciting of a dogpile or accusations of “punching down” which can certainly backfire. 

Often, a retweet or subtweet is actually complimentary, and, as Haider notes, can be a great way to share good content.

Critique

Critique without constructive feedback doesn’t seem to be very popular. Some find it boring and just plain lazy. There seems to be a certain consensus that there are those who try to get attention or increase follower accounts through these tactics. An account that never produces content or that provides dishonest content doesn’t seem to be worth much time. It seems many actually appreciate positivity and constructivity!

Other tips:

Be aware of Twitter rules and avoid hateful conduct as defined by its policies. Twitter is not a free speech website. Remember that rules are constantly revised.

Consider that you are the curator of your own Twitter feed. Design it the way you want to be.

Be charitable with others. Assume good faith unless or until proven otherwise.

Block and mute as necessary. Many people feel blocking or muting is a weakness or surrender, but there are accounts that are just not worth engaging. Others seem to have little else to do and will simply waste valuable time. Occasionally, accounts actually become abusive and need to go.

Confront slurs and/or misrepresentations of your statements or ideas and then cease further interaction.

Take breaks if necessary or consider taking your account private for a bit. Maintain calm and composure. Apologize if it’s warranted. 

Stay away from out-of-context isolated tweets or viral videos. There is often much more to the story.

Read or at least skim articles before commenting. Headlines are often quite misleading.

Don’t participate in outrage mobbing, especially if the person is not a public figure or is underage.

Treat others with dignity. Some do suffer from mental health problems and may not have other communication outlets. Stay humble. 

Embrace good digital citizenship and never retweet fake news. Fact check.

Use humor or gentle teasing to ease tension.

Ask questions.

The Roseanne Rule: Tweet while intoxicated at your own risk. Remember that even though she apologized profusely, she was ostracized.