DUMBO uses science to explain to me why our Pride Parade is “disgusting”

Normally, I refrain from commenting on Facebook when I do not know the person. But… this weekend I was looking up details on the PRIDE Parade in my city and just happened to run across this comment by a person I have named DUMBO. (I am identified as ME and others are identified as RATIONAL PEOPLE.) Please not DUMBO actually uses the word SCIENCE as part of his argument.

DUMBO

Oh we’re normalizing mental illnesses now? Disgusting.

ME

This is the 36th year of the parade, so I’d say you’re a bit behind the times on the normalization.

DUMBO

Never behind. Same ol same ol. Still sick. Still not right.

RATIONAL PERSON #1

please keep your comments to yourself if theyre going to be negative. its about equality. its not a mental illness. the whole festival was filled with love just like the LGBTQ community. it saddens me that you choose to fight the movent instead of get behind it. everyone deserves to be loved.

DUMBO

The lgbtqrstuvwxyz is filled with hateful freaks that care about equality only at their expense. “The movent” is immoral and not a good story for the future but will be a good life lesson.

RATIONAL PERSON #2

The only hateful freak I see here is you so look in the mirror.

DUMBO

Practically erasing generations of children and essentially stopping the family tree. Their sickening in both ways.

RATIONAL PERSON #1

no its people like you who are immoral. closed minded & selfish. there are 7 billion people on this planet. you think a few thousand people is going to stop some family trees? please rethink your argument. you sicken me.

DUMBO

I don’t have parades over my sexuality. I don’t wear assess chaps around town with kids watching because that’s normal now. And hey when those two gay dads or gay moms “marry” and adopt do you think that adopted kid is blood? NO! hence destroying the family tree. What sickens me is that you defend it.

RATIONAL PERSON #3

Please do not give him a platform in your life. You will never change his view. It is not worth your time or energy.

DUMBO

plus it’s a free country

RATIONAL PERSON #4

You don’t like it I’d suggest getting tf out of town..this city is beautiful and free and Pride is the epitome of how amazing our city is. And we don’t need closed minded people like you mucking up all this beauty! I am proud of my city and proud to call it my home, how about spending some time loving instead of hating? Because all the lgbt community has ever done was love and you cannot throw animosity at that…that makes you disgusting

DUMBO

it’s beautiful just the way it was. Not changing street names and having a whole month in honor of what we used to call mental disorders. Love is nothing of what it used to be you know the sacred bond between a MAN and a WOMAN. To “love” today is to forfeit your life away from science and god. The LGBT loves everyone that agrees with them and their delusions (of course) hearing what they want to hear. Your life choices and support is disgusting.

RATIONAL PERSON #4

If same sex love is wrong then I don’t wanna be right, and I’m bisexual! I don’t even base love on gender. I wish you all the love and happiness in the world, I hope with that one day with that love and true happiness you can understand that love is for anyone, and the cold hate in your heart will melt and you will no longer be a person who brings down the world around you because of something you simply don’t understand. Peace to you ✌

DUMBO

good. Because you aren’t. and my love and my kids love will be with the opposition gender you know the normal thing that’s been happening and succeeding since forever. I sadly understand your freak show more than you. Peace and luck to you because you’re going to need it.

RATIONAL PERSON #5

https://www.inquisitr.com/…/low-cognitive-ability…/

INQUISITR.COM

Low Cognitive Ability Linked To Prejudice Against Same-Sex…

ME

Since you mention science, you might want to know your ideas are extremely outdated. But I would presume you are getting your “science” from other types of texts.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/…/when-homosexuality…

PSYCHOLOGYTODAY.COM

When Homosexuality Stopped Being a Mental Disorder

And RATIONAL PEOPLE, you are right. He will not change his mind because he is what we call doxastically closed. It is a type of logic which does not open itself to new ideas because the belief system he has is impenetrable and not open to new information–even in the face of science–so I will refrain from commenting any further as well.

DUMBO TO ME

stop caring. Stop commenting. Stop believing. Stop thinking. Stop assuming.


I gave Dumbo the last word because it was hopeless. I hope he does not come and burn a cross in my yard. Ah well.

 

Roseanne has been seduced by conspiracy theorists on Twitter

Update 6.20.18 Roseanne retweets today’s Qanon post:

——————–

Once Roseanne tweeted about Qanon last month, I knew she had gone  around the bend and was falling victim to the most popular conspiracy theory circulating on Twitter: Qanon: The Great Awakening.

Qanon: The Storm is Coming, The Great Awakening & Follow the White Rabbit

I am quite sure Qanon enthusiasts inundated Roseanne with info about the conspiracy. The problem with conspiracies in general, is that they rely on faith as opposed to reason–in that sense these theories are similar to religion or deeply held ideologies.

According to the political scientist Michael Barkun, conspiracy theories rely on the view that the universe is governed by design, and embody three principles:

  1. nothing happens by accident
  2. nothing is as it seems
  3. everything is connected.
  4.  Another common feature is that conspiracy theories evolve to incorporate whatever evidence exists against them, so that they become, as Barkun writes, a closed system that is unfalsifiable, and therefore “a matter of faith rather than proof.”

Barkun, Michael (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 58.

It seems this Qanon character has taken his/her/their methods right out to the conspiracy playbook. The motto is “Trust the plan.” Everything is under control and behind the scenes the globalists (Soros, Obama, etc.) are being handled (headed to prison/Gitmo).

The memes circulating purport to reveal these connections–hence, the false info that Soros is marrying off his relatives into the mainstream government.

Even Wikileaks tweeted about Qanon over the weekend, saying they assumed it is a LARP (Live Action Role Player) but more nefariously that it could be co-opted as a psyop.

To prove the unfalsifiablity–

Wikileaks is drawing attention to it because it is true??

Also, Wikileaks-related journalists are cautioning that Q is saying Assange is safely out to the embassy and in some sort of protective custody–not true, of course.

The seductive nature of this conspiracy and the sheer volume of followers (it is often the number one trending hashtag on Twitter although Twitter supresses it–only feeding confirmation bias) has spawned videos, products, books–you name it.

Sometimes I wonder if it isn’t a very clever money-making operation! If it didn’t start out that way, it could certainly become a motive to continue to promote the narrative.

As we denounce those accused of bad acts, may we still love their work?

 

 

Why do some women choose to stay with cheating husbands?

It’s very modern and edgy these days to read articles about how monogamy may be an unrealistic expectation in marriage, how cheating might even help a marriage, how we should rethink our views about cheating, and so on. And that’s all just fine and dandy if the non-monogamy is consensual—but that’s not really the norm. The norm is that the sex outside the marriage is secretive and deceptive and affairs are still a major reason for divorce. And, although the gap may be closing, men still opt for cheating more than women.

Through online forums and interviews, I was able to take a glimpse into the private lives of women who had dealt with a cheating husband who often turned out to be a serial cheater. Was it really no big deal? And, when given the opportunity, what motivated them to stay?

Of course, not all women are given a choice of whether to stay or go. There are plenty of husbands that simply trade them in, usually lining up their replacement before announcing they are out of the marriage. But here, we are talking about women dealing with cheating husbands who seem to want to stay married but cheat anyway. Why do the women say they decided to stay?

  1. Love—These wives actually love their husbands. For most wives, the cheating is not constant—there may be periods in between where things get better—maybe a few years go by and they think they are past it. And then it happens yet again—and they are traumatized, blindsided, in shock, and they love so much about their husbands, but every woman is different in just how much she can endure.

Some will stay for the duration, some will be discarded, and some will make the hard decision to go, even wishing they had made the decision to leave long before, after the first cheating episode was revealed.

“The idiots-who-take-them-back club is big. It was 4 years between my first discovery and my second discovery.”

“There is more to a marriage than sex, but it causes such tremendous damage to intimacy and trust that it is hard to recover. The periods in between the cheating episodes can be normal and hopeful. Other parts of the marriage can be happy-ish—companionship, compatibility, shared interests, sharing responsibilities for family, shared history, especially in long-term marriages.”

  1. Economic realities—The stories of women finding out about cheating never occur at a convenient time economically. Some were pregnant, some were pregnant and had a toddler as well, some had left the workforce to become a full-time mom. Others had spent a generation with their husbands and amassed a complicated and intertwined set of joint accounts. Some were on the verge or retirement. Some just couldn’t face the economic reality of the cost of divorce combined with an unanticipated return to the workplace. Statistics prove that a woman’s standard of living will go down after divorce by about 25 percent while men’s will go up by a minimum of 10 percent.

“I knew I would not come out well in the divorce financially. A marriage is also a financial partnership, and it was definitely a factor in why I stayed. Plus, after each infidelity, I was traumatized and didn’t feel like I could make good decisions. I dreaded the process of dividing everything up on top of all the emotions I was already experiencing. It was overwhelming.”

  1. Children/extended family—Speaking of consequences of cheating, it is hard to imagine a spouse who doesn’t care that they are threatening and disrespecting more than their spouse—it absolutely hurts their children as well as their extended families who have become one family over the years.

When the wives were confronted with cheating while still raising small children, or even anticipating the birth of another child, the idea of becoming a single parent or having to ferry children back and forth between households during the week and on holidays was all just too much.

Sometimes, they believed their children would be better off in a two-parent household. Sometimes the wives themselves just found it would be in their own best interest to stay.

“Yes I’m the chump that put up with the lies, deflection, projection, gaslighting, word salad, crazy making for 25 years all for the sake of the children.”

“I think that too many people hold onto relationships broken by infidelity because of the guilt that they feel when they think about their kids.”

“I am not looking forward to finding a new job so I can earn more money and be away from my kids a ton more. It is hard to push thru to a future you are not looking forward to even though you know it is necessary.”

  1. The husband can/will change—If the men were wanting to stay married, they usually made convincing arguments that they would change. And here’s the deal—the wives want to believe this is true. They are themselves decent, honest, moral women who have committed to marriage, who have not cheated themselves, who are loyal to a fault. They are susceptible to promises of change because they can’t fathom how the husband, the person they trust and love, would lie to them again. Others simply said it was easier to believe they would change—easier than facing the reality that their husbands truly put their needs first and were willing to hurt them at the deepest of levels. It was just too much.

“I took a HUGE toke off of the hopium pipe when he interacted with a couple who had a great deal of love between them…he told me that he admired their relationship and I immediately had visions that he would learn that devotion and commitment come first and the fruits follow and he would be ‘that guy’ and we would be so happy and bonded… but alas, he lost interest in that whole idea in minutes (or perhaps remembered that his years of cheating were a stumbling block to real intimacy) and forgot the whole idea.”

“I really do feel sorry for my 30 year younger self. She should have run the other way the first time she saw him. He was a wolf in sheep’s clothing and the wolf showed himself here and there, I forgave him and felt so sorry for him being a wolf. I really believed he wanted to change. I believed he had the capacity to change. He certainly had the tools, opportunity and resources to be a better man. What he lacked was the will, the honest desire and the character to be better.”

“The promises of change seemed sincere—and maybe they even were sincere for a time. But then something would happen—I think sometimes it was just boredom—he just couldn’t find meaning in life or excitement in life if he wasn’t pursuing sex outside the marriage. He didn’t really seem engaged in life—he didn’t like to handle life’s little details. He was emotionally and intellectually lazy, and cruising online for anonymous sex or flings seemed to be the answer to that boredom. And the secrecy and getting one over on me seemed to make it all the more exciting, I guess. It was really just that simple and shallow. It was fantasy and an escape from reality. So many better ways he could have spent his time—so much meaning in life that he missed. Such a better legacy he could have left for his children. He was destructive to us as a family and destructive to himself.”

“I convinced myself that his negative actions were the result of depression or bipolar or anxiety or SOMETHING that allowed for the possibility of change and recovery.”

  1. Denial of reality—This came in two forms—one was the husband denying the truth of the marriage. The second was the denial of reality by the wife—an idea of what she thought her marriage was or what it used to be—and that reality either never existed or had changed. Looking back, most women realized that it never really was the marriage they believed it was. It just took an awfully long time to see it.

“I have come to realize that you will never know what was running through his head. I cannot cry over what could have been.”

“I thought we could go on forever being grandparents together.”

“I believed him, because I wanted the fairy tale romance to be true. And me believing him lead to another 23 years of lying.”

“It’s all a mirage and poof— it’s not really there! Takes a long time to see them for who they are.”

“It is the fear that keeps us trying to hold on to the cheater- the desire to continue with the life we thought we had (and which for me I NEVER actually had, it was an illusion)– and to hold it together for the kids.”

“It was so surreal–not the life I thought I had built with him.”

“I too began to look back, after his final gigantic exit affair, which was proceeded by many other instances of paid sex and work-related improprieties. I started to really doubt my marriage was ever really what I thought it was. I began to think he never really loved me at all. I think I was just part of an image he wanted to project, but not really a person. By the women he chose to exploit, I realized he degraded women—they were often vulnerable or easily discredited. And clearly he didn’t respect me.”

“I always trusted him. (I had suspected something at the time but blew it off.) Now, I’m going back analyzing my entire life with him and I am thinking of a lot of other suspicious things he got away with. The fact is, I would never have believed he was that kind of person.”

“I gave it my 100% and his 100%. He didn’t have to work hard at our relationship. I was doing it all for us and believing his words of devotion and commitment. I was gaslighted, lied to, cheated on (apparently more frequently than I first found out about), abandoned…and I still had hope.”

“I knew something was up, but surely my husband of 25 years would never lie to me! The smirks, the eye rolls, the silent treatment. I was the recipient of it all. My ex knew me well enough to know that I would never judge him without ‘proof.’ Well, proof I got in the form of a front page news story.”

“I look back and wonder why I was so stupid. How could I have believed the garbage he was spewing? At one time, I was hung up on blaming myself. I was so committed to my marriage that I was not acknowledging what was right in front of me. I am more forgiving of myself, now. That’s what these kinds of people do; they make you doubt your own judgment.”

  1. Gaslighting—After so many lies and cover-ups, many wives began to doubt their sanity. They no longer trusted their intuition or their judgment. Decision-making became increasingly difficult.

When the cheating was revealed as the result of an STD diagnosis, many of the women were so shell-shocked, they couldn’t make a rational decision, or the prospect of divorce on top of everything else was just more than they could handle. So they chose to stay simply to avoid additional emotional distress.

“My husband wrote, ‘to my best friend and sexy wife … whom I deeply love.’  Then he got caught the very next week texting one of the other women.”

“He has tried every tactic in the book to convince me otherwise. He tells me that he loves me and he would never do anything like that to hurt our family or our relationship. He tells me that my imagination is just making normal things look bad.”

“My husband sent me a message to say, ‘it can all come back,’ with a photo of us celebrating our 30th anniversary. Literally, the next day he texted his (also married) affair partner that he was ‘throwing his marriage out the window for her’—that he loved her, that he had told everyone in his family he loved her and wanted to marry her…he referred to me, his wife of more than 30 years, as ‘the warden’ and told his affair partner I ‘slept all day.’ If I hadn’t seen the text messages, I would never have believed he could be so cruel.”

“I had evidence and confessions but STILL found it difficult to accept and then move into action. My paralysis was short, three months–divorce will be final early next year.”

“I think it’s very difficult to make informed decisions while you are going through the unparalleled emotional pain of infidelity.”

“My biggest regret is not trusting my gut (intuition.) My gut told me something was wrong even before we got engaged. I saw what I thought was evidence Even though my gut was SCREAMING at me that something was wrong, I still chose to believe him.”

“That is the trick, being objective – which can be very difficult. Talk to others—close friends, family—let them be objective for you.”

“Somewhere along the way I think I did begin to doubt my sanity. He had told me for so long I was wrong about facts, that I was reading things into situations, that things weren’t really they way I thought they were, that there was something wrong with me—I just started to believe his reality, and I didn’t really know what the true reality of my own life was. I know a lot about what he was up to, but I will never know everything.”

“My mind and my spirit were damaged. It was not even remotely the person I was or ever had been—it was like I was brainwashed. He took me to very low places and exposed me to people of very low character. I lost my dignity and kept lowering the standards of what I was willing to accept. I just wasn’t me anymore.”

“I feel like a part of my mind has been stolen. Thief….”

“I look back now and it all makes sense.”

“It’s opened my eyes about humanity. The good, the bad, and the sick, sad and just plain fucked up worlds some people live in.”

“I never thought in a million years I would have experienced what I have in the last few years. I truly had my head stuck in the sand and I have had feelings and pain I didn’t know even existed.”

Duping Delight, Cheater’s High, Sneaky Thrills: When Duping Becomes an Aphrodisiac

  1. Sunk cost fallacy–The sunk cost fallacy involves the concept that you have so much invested in a decision or a material object, that letting it go is wasteful and you must honor your sunk costs.

Example 1: You buy an expensive ticket to a Broadway show. The show gets terrible reviews and the person who you were going with no longer wants to go. You now don’t want to go either but you spent so much on the ticket that you feel like you have to attend.

Example 2: You bought an expensive pair of shoes, but they are uncomfortable and wobbly. You spent so much that you wear them anyway and regret it. Then, you put them in your closet, but you can’t stand to throw them out because they cost so much.

Well, some women eventually ask themselves if they are refusing to leave a serial cheater due to sunk costs. After a long term marriage, finally giving up is very difficult. One, you are left at an age where your options are limited and where finding a job may be more difficult. Two, surely your husband is now old enough to quit cheating.

One woman relayed how her husband was still cheating at age 67 with an old girlfriend he dragged up on Facebook. Her friend was shocked: “Don’t they have grandchildren they should be playing with?” Yup, for some, particularly the narcissist types, the party never ends—nor does the pain to the wife. “Sadly, both these fine married people (not to each other) did have grandchildren they could have been playing with—they just preferred meeting up for public blow jobs in the car.”

Decades-long marriages can be especially hard to leave because (1) you’ve invested most of your life and all your money in it; (2) you may have just wasted the bulk of your years on earth with this person; (3) family and friends told you to get out a long time ago; (4) you made the mistake of believing him when he committed to no more cheating.

“No matter how long you’ve been married–some investments are just bad and need to be dumped—cut your losses. I think it’s a bad risk to continue to trust people who have GIVEN you reason to not trust them.”

“Every day I think of the dupery and that the dupery gets deeper the longer and more I dig. I find myself still ‘suffering’ still having so much trouble moving on from this.”

“I am blamed by people for letting him ‘get away’ with it, in other words, I am blamed for being blinded that nothing was going on, or allowing myself to be in limbo too long while he was living it up never batting an eyelash and ‘going on’ with his life, while still married to me. I think back and little/big things come up like him constantly texting at dinner while we were out, jumping up to ‘use the bathroom’ at a restaurant or the last days it is was jumping up and running outside to take a phone call—‘I have to get this,’ leaving me sitting in the restaurant, etc. Looking back now I was such a fool. He was in deep since day one.”

“You don’t want to admit things didn’t work, or that you could be so easily fooled.”

“Leaving a long term marriage is so very difficult. It is the equivalent of cutting off a body part. But that part is cancerous and is going to kill your spirit. My life hasn’t been the easiest since I left, but it is my life, and it is not one of deception and contempt. Like so many here, I wish I had left a lifetime ago.”

(This article is excerpted from a book I am writing with the working title  Cheating Husbands: What Wives Would Like You to Know.)

North Korea to hold nuclear dismantling ceremony; Invites journalists

Castle Romeo (yield 11 Mt) – an atmospheric nuclear test carried out by the U.S. on 1 March 1954 at Bikini Atoll, Marshal Islands. It was the third largest test ever detonated by the United States the first deployed thermonuclear device. Image in the public domain Image: U.S Government

Photo: The Official CTBTO Photostream

Press Release of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Date: 05/12/2018


Pyongyang, May 12 (KCNA) — The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea issued a following press release on Saturday:

In accordance with the decision of the Third Plenary Meeting of the Seventh Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea, the Nuclear Weapon Institute and other concerned institutions are taking technical measures for dismantling the northern nuclear test ground of the DPRK in order to ensure transparency of discontinuance of the nuclear test.

A ceremony for dismantling the nuclear test ground is now scheduled between May 23 and 25, depending on weather condition.

Dismantlement of the nuclear test ground will be done in the following sequence-making all tunnels of the test ground collapse by explosion; completely blocking entries; removing all observation facilities, research institutes and structures of guard units on the ground.

In parallel with dismantlement of the nuclear test ground, guards and researchers will be withdrawn and the surrounding area of the test ground be completely closed.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the DPRK is authorized, in this regard, to release the following decisions.

First, it has intention to allow not only the local press but also journalists of other countries to conduct on-the-spot coverage in order to show in a transparent manner the dismantlement of the northern nuclear test ground to be carried out in accordance with the decision of the Third Plenary Meeting of the Seventh Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea.

In due consideration of small space of the test ground, journalists from other countries will be confined to those from China, Russia, United States, United Kingdom and south Korea.

Second, the following steps will be taken for providing convenience of visit and coverage to international journalists.

1) All international journalists will be provided with charter flight from Beijing to Wonsan, and other related steps such as opening territorial air space will be taken.

2) Special accommodation will be arranged in Wonsan for stay of the international journalists, and press center be set up for their use.

3) Special charter train will be arranged from Wonsan to the northern nuclear test ground for the international journalists.

4) In consideration of the fact that the test ground is located in the uninhabited deep mountain area, the international journalists will be accommodated in the special charter train and be provided with appropriate conveniences.

5) Necessary conditions and cooperation will be provided to the international journalists so that they can transmit at the press center about dismantlement of the test ground which they have covered on the spot.

The DPRK will, also in the future, promote close contacts and dialogue with the neighboring countries and the international society so as to safeguard peace and stability on the Korean peninsula and over the globe. -0-

Guns Now Allowed in Churches, Houses of Worship in Oklahoma

Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin has signed into law a bill which will expand “Stand Your Ground” to Churches and other Houses of Worship effective November 1, 2018.

 

An Act
ENROLLED HOUSE
BILL NO. 2632 By: Babinec, Ritze, Montgomery, Humphrey, Roberts (Sean), Faught and Downing of the House and Bergstrom and Pittman of
the Senate

An Act relating to firearms; amending 21 O.S. 2011,
Section 1289.25, as amended by Section 2, Chapter
266, O.S.L. 2017 (21 O.S. Supp. 2017, Section
1289.25), which relates to the use of deadly force;
expanding right to use deadly force at certain
places; defining term; and providing an effective
date.

SUBJECT: Firearms
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION 1. AMENDATORY 21 O.S. 2011, Section 1289.25, as
amended by Section 2, Chapter 266, O.S.L. 2017 (21 O.S. Supp. 2017,
Section 1289.25), is amended to read as follows:
Section 1289.25

PHYSICAL OR DEADLY FORCE AGAINST INTRUDER
A. The Legislature hereby recognizes that the citizens of the
State of Oklahoma have a right to expect absolute safety within
their own homes or, places of business or places of worship and have
the right to establish policies regarding the possession of weapons
on property pursuant to the provisions of Section 1290.22 of this
title.

ENR. H. B. NO. 2632 Page 2
B. A person, regardless of official capacity or lack of
official capacity, within a place of worship or a person, an owner,
manager or employee of a business is presumed to have held a
reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to
himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is
intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another
if:
1. a. The person against whom the defensive force was used
was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully
entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a
dwelling, residence, occupied vehicle, or a place of
business or place of worship, or if that person had
removed or was attempting to remove another against
the will of that person from the dwelling, residence,
occupied vehicle, or place of business; and or place
of worship.
2. b. The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason
to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or
unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had
occurred; or
2. The person who uses defensive force knew or had a reasonable
belief that the person against whom the defensive force was used
entered or was attempting to enter into a dwelling, residence,
occupied vehicle, place of business or place of worship for the
purpose of committing a forcible felony, as defined in Section 733
of this title, and that the defensive force was necessary to prevent
the commission of the forcible felony.
C. The presumption set forth in subsection B of this section
does not apply if:
1. The person against whom the defensive force is used has the
right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence,
or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is
not a protective order from domestic violence in effect or a written
pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person;
2. The person or persons sought to be removed are children or
grandchildren, or are otherwise in the lawful custody or under the
lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force
is used; or
ENR. H. B. NO. 2632 Page 3
3. The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an
unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, occupied
vehicle, or place of business or place of worship to further an
unlawful activity.
D. A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who
is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has
no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and
meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she
reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or
great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the
commission of a forcible felony.
E. A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to
enter the dwelling, residence, occupied vehicle of another person,
or a place of business or place of worship is presumed to be doing
so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or
violence.
F. A person who uses defensive force, as permitted pursuant to
the provisions of subsections A, B, and D and E of this section, is
justified in using such defensive force and is immune from criminal
prosecution and civil action for the use of such defensive force.
As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes
charging or prosecuting the defendant.
G. A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for
investigating the use of defensive force, but the law enforcement
agency may not arrest the person for using defensive force unless it
determines that there is probable cause that the defensive force
that was used was unlawful.
H. The court shall award reasonable attorney fees, court costs,
compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the
defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if
the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as
provided in subsection F of this section.
I. The provisions of this section and the provisions of the
Oklahoma Self-Defense Act shall not be construed to require any
person using a weapon pursuant to the provisions of this section to
be licensed in any manner.
ENR. H. B. NO. 2632 Page 4
J. A person pointing a weapon at a perpetrator in self-defense
or in order to thwart, stop or deter a forcible felony or attempted
forcible felony shall not be deemed guilty of committing a criminal
act.
K. As used in this section:
1. “Defensive force” includes, but shall not be limited to,
pointing a weapon at a perpetrator in self-defense or in order to
thwart, stop or deter a forcible felony or attempted forcible
felony;
2. “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind,
including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is
temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over
it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people;
3. “Place of worship” means:
a. any permanent building, structure, facility or office
space owned, leased, rented or borrowed, on a fulltime
basis, when used for worship services, activities
and business of the congregation, which may include,
but not be limited to, churches, temples, synagogues
and mosques, and
b. any permanent building, structure, facility or office
space owned, leased, rented or borrowed for use on a
temporary basis, when used for worship services,
activities and business of the congregation including,
but not limited to, churches, temples, synagogues and
mosques;
4. “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides
either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited
guest; and
4. 5. “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not
motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.
SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2018.
ENR. H. B. NO. 2632 Page 5
Passed the House of Representatives the 30th day of April, 2018.

Did President Trump Display Bad Manners at State Dinner? #ToastGate

Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks.

The above photo appeared on the White House Facebook Page following the Trump Administration’s first State Dinner celebrating the visit of French President Macron.

One comment claimed President Trump showed oafishness and lack of proper etiquette during a toast with Macron. Why? Because he did not hold his glass by the stem while Macron did. Here’s a close-up view:

Well, etiquette experts are quite divided on this issue. While many do suggest that holding the glass by the stem is preferable, holding it by the bowl is also quite acceptable.

Pictures that appeared (uncredited) on Twitter show a wide variety of glass-holding by all.

So, I wondered… What would Obama do?

President Barack Obama and President Hu Jintao of China toast during the State Dinner in the State Dining Room of the White House, Jan. 19, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)

President Franois Hollande of France raises a toast with President Barack Obama during the State Dinner on the South Lawn of the White House, Feb. 11, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Amanda Lucidon)
President Xi and Obama Official White House Photo By Pete Souza

Case closed?

First State Dinner Menu, Additional Details Released

PFLAG Rescinds Straight for Equality in Media Award to Joy Reid

APRIL 24, 2018

PFLAG National—the nation’s first and largest organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people, their families, and allies—today has rescinded its Straight for Equality in Media award to political analyst Joy Reid.

Said PFLAG National president Jean Hodges, “When we extended our invitation to Ms. Reid to honor her at our 45th anniversary celebration, we did so knowing about the blog posts from the late 2000s regarding Charlie Crist. We appreciated how she stepped up, took ownership, apologized for them, and did better—this is the behavior and approach we ask of any ally. However, in light of new information, and the ongoing investigation of that information, we must at this time rescind our award to Ms. Reid.”

The event was already scheduled for May 9, 2018 in Washington, D.C.

About PFLAG

PFLAG is the extended family of the LGBTQ community. We’re made up of LGBTQ individuals, family members and allies. Because together, we’re stronger.

The Internet Archive published a blog post denying that there was any evidence that her blog was tampered with in the “Wayback Machine.” Such a claim would potentially throw into question the integrity of the archive, making the use of the collection unreliable.

Addressing Recent Claims of “Manipulated” Blog Posts in the Wayback Machine

Skeptical about the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC): Is this data reliable?

The Southern Poverty Law Center’s has published “McInnes, Molyneux, and 4chan: Investigating pathways to the alt-right.” Written by the Hatewatch Staff, the article first asks: “What brings someone into the alt-right ecosystem?”

SPLC:  “The question was posed in two threads posted during the last week of March on the white nationalist forum The Right Stuff (TRS), leading 74 individual users to describe their radicalization narratives.”

Ok, just to clarity, this is 74 anonymous people who might be trolls, who might have more than one user name, who might be undercover cops, who might be journalists, who might be anti-white nationalists trying to discredit white nationalists or who might have a personal agenda to actively smear a certain person—do I have this right?

Ironically, the SPLC makes use of the terms “deeply flawed data” and “faulty statistical analysis” to drive home the point that the Alt-Right will misuse information and science in order to boost its adherents.

Here is the charted data as presented by the SPLC. Remember, we don’t know who the 74 people are, we don’t know if these mentions were in the positive or the negative in terms of “influence.” This is the methodology further explained:

SPLC: “The 107 individuals and platforms mentioned by posters in the TRS threads have been labeled according to their ideology, which include alt-right, legacy white nationalist, alt-lite, mainstream, libertarian, skeptic, men’s rights activist, and conspiracy, in addition to a random category for those not easily classified.”

And I have one more question about the reliability of this data—let’s assume for a moment that these are 74 unique, card-carrying members of the Alt-right. Then how do we account for the fact that the SPLC acknowledges that these folks actively propagandize, misinform, distort and co-opt culture and ideas to legitimize this ideology? Would this still be a reliable pool from which to extract hard data?

https://www.splcenter.org/20180419/mcinnes-molyneux-and-4chan-investigating-pathways-alt-right

Joe Rogan with Sam Harris & Maajid Nawaz Discuss the SPLC & More

Joe Rogan with Sam Harris & Maajid Nawaz Discuss the SPLC & More

Spoiler: They did not smoke weed during the podcast.

The highly anticipated Joe Rogan Podcast featuring guests Maajid Nawaz and Sam Harris was aired live on April 19, 2018.

Nawaz promised an update on his lawsuit against the SPLC, who had named him as an anti-Muslim extremist in the 2016 publication, now removed from the website, titled “Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists – Southern Poverty Law Center.” The outcry upon the publication of this list, which also included activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali, was tremendous, and yet the SPLC refused to back down.

Nawaz explained as background that he had also been placed in a terrorist watch database in the UK, the opposite extreme of the characterization made by the SPLC.

On October 18, 2017, Quilliam, an organization Nawaz founded to counter extremism, issued the following press release:

Maajid Nawaz Wins Legal Battle Against Thomson Reuters World Check

Thomson Reuters World Check has admitted that Maajid Nawaz should never have been listed under their ‘terrorism’ designation, and will pay significant defamation damages to compensate for the harm that has been caused to Nawaz’s personal and professional reputation. Nawaz was represented by Mark Lewis of Seddons law firm.

Thomson Reuters have said:

“Mr. Nawaz’s World-Check profile had included him in the “Terrorism” category and we accept that this categorisation was made in error. We corrected this error on 27th April 2016 and removed Mr. Nawaz from that category. We have apologized to Mr. Nawaz for the error and apologize to our subscribers for any misunderstanding.”

In 2016, VICE News broke the story that Quilliam’s Founder Maajid Nawaz was placed on a ‘terrorism blacklist’ within Thomson Reuters World-Check database.

In the original story, two senior World-Check employees, who asked not to be named, told VICE News that in over eight years of working at the firm they had not seen a single case of an individual successfully challenging their terror designation.

Earlier this year, the BBC were also forced to apologise live on air to Maajid Nawaz after he was called an ‘extremist’ during a live broadcast.

Maajid Nawaz is now 2-0 in the fight against lies, aimed at damaging his reputation.

As many are aware, Maajid Nawaz has announced his intention to sue the Southern Poverty Law Center for defamation after they actually named him on a list of ‘Anti-Muslim Extremists’ and asserted among other falsehoods that Nawaz believes ‘all Muslims are potential terrorists’ and claiming that he wants ‘all Mosques to be surveilled’.

Because of the extensive legal costs of defamation cases in the U.S., Nawaz has been crowd-funding his legal fund against the SPLC and has successfully passed Phase 1 thanks to the generous donations from his supporters. Yet more support is needed to bring the SPLC to justice and to fund the entire legal case.

Maajid Nawaz said:

“That a reforming liberal Muslim like me who attempts to hold a rational conversation around religion, identity and extremism is designated under a ‘Muslim terrorism’ category in the UK, while simultaneously being listed as an ‘anti-Muslim extremist’ in the USA, speaks to our hysterical and irrational climate today.

Support my struggle for reason by donating to bring the SPLC to justice at www.maajidnawaz.com. I pledge to donate all winnings to my US 501c3 charity.

To the mega-rich bullies at the SPLC, I say: your defamation of individuals who themselves have been the victims of extremism and who devote their lives to fighting extremism by calling them “extremists” is a moral outrage. It is time that you be brought to justice.” (end)

———–

Nawaz announced on Rogan’s show that he has retained the Clare Locke Law firm to represent him, the same firm that won a substantial defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone Magazine. The lawsuit against the SPLC will move forward.

Harris noted that 20 years ago, the SPLC was doing excellent work bringing suit against organizations such as the KKK, but now seems morally confused. Harris pointed to his recent mention on the Hatewatch page that the SPLC maintains for having been criticized in an article by Vox for his interview with Charles Murray. Harris notes that he is listed alongside other articles about the Austin bomber and neo-Nazi groups.

Nawaz talked about his life and how he had come to this point in his life. He grew up in the UK, facing violent attacks perpetrated by neo-Nazis armed with hammers and machetes. At age 16, he joined Hizb ut-Tahrir, a non-violent Islamist political group that sought to establish a Caliphate through infiltration into military and society and instigating coups. Ultimately, this activity landed him in prison in Egypt, although many others that were rounded up were tortured and killed. He was held as a political prisoner for 5 years.

During that time, Amnesty International adopted him and his cohorts as prisoners of conscience and campaigned for their release. The support and interest he received from Amnesty International changed his psyche. He no longer embraced extremism, but looked instead to reform.

Sam Harris was much more cheerful after the sting of the SPLC’s Hatewatch debacle, combined with a major mobbing attack on Twitter.

He was able to chuckle about the fact that the hoopla all occurred while he was on a long-awaited family vacation in Hawaii. Harris said the only saving grace was that they were travelling with another family with children and that he was required to pull himself together and be social.

Harris is now pulling back from Twitter after this last episode and has deleted it off phone, but will keep his account open. His observation is that Twitter amplifies certain voices and circulates smears, smears he saw as an egregious attack on his moral integrity.

Harris regrets publishing his email exchange with Ezra Klein of Vox, saying the emails ended up making him look angry and Ezra look open-minded.

Reflecting on his podcast episode with Klein, Harris felt Klein was fundamentally unresponsive to any of Harris’s points. Harris felt like his audience and Klein’s audience are very different—Klein’s audience is happy if you are scoring political points by decrying racism and white privilege, even if that’s not the topic of the conversation.

Harris will continue to use Twitter as a curated newsfeed, because he benefits from the sharing of articles, but not what’s coming in the form of feedback. He has even changed his setting so that he can screen out accounts without verified emails or with eggs as identifiers.

Sam Harris vs Ezra Klein on the Waking Up Podcast: “Identity and Honesty”

The conversation briefly got off on the hot button issue of trangendered people in sports, but it was not central to the conversation. It came up because Joe Rogan had recently been attacked by an online mob for promoting the idea that in MMA fighting, a man who had transitioned into a woman had an unfair advantage.

The rest of the interview focused on Nawaz and his predictions for the future. He is optimistic, but he says it may take another generation for true reform to happen and for extremism to be fully eradicated. He warned that while ISIS may be reducing its power, Al Qaeda has been reorganizing under the radar in Syria. At this time, they are even grooming one of Bin Laden’s sons to become the new leader, which Nawaz expects will attract extremists loyal to the Bin Laden dynasty.

Rapture Letter: Here’s what your letter should include

With two predictions of the end of the world coming up, one on April 23, 2018 and another in June (see below), it’s time to write your Rapture Letter.

Instructions:

Leave your letter in a plastic container that is marked “to be opened after my disappearance.” (There are also paid services that will automatically email your letter to designated addresses on your behalf because the Internet will still be operating.)

What to include in your letter:

Dear Friend or Family Member,

I have disappeared unexplainably along with millions of others and probably all children who are younger than 13-14 years old. There may even be a pile of clothes left in the spot where I was last seen.

Many of you will wonder what happened. Science and mainstream media (possibly CNN) will try to offer various explanations such as:

I disappeared voluntarily.

I was murdered.

I was abducted by aliens.

I disappeared as the result of a secret military experiment.

The truth is that The Rapture has occurred and I am now safely and happily in heaven.

As predicted in the Bible, now begins The Tribulation. This is a period which will last for 7 years. During this time, you will have an opportunity to confess your sins and become saved so that you can join me in heaven, but you will need to be prepared for what is about to happen.

Gather cash, preferably gold, silver or diamonds, and survival supplies like canned food and water. Buy a generator and weapons and ammo. Move out of populated areas if possible. If you can get to Israel, that will be best. Hide your Bible in a safe place.

A charismatic (male) political leader (likely of European, possibly Roman descent) will emerge and things will seem good because there will be peace in the Middle East and the leader promises to unite the world under a one-world government.

This leader is actually the anti-Christ. You will be pressured to take his “mark.” It could be just be a tattoo, but it may very well be an implanted chip or invisible mark made by a laser. Don’t fall for it. It is the mark of the beast and it will condemn you to eternal damnation.

Expect that 2 male messengers/witnesses will be sent to earth by God to offer redemption, but they will be mocked and discredited. They will perform miracles. They will be on earth for 3 and a half years (1260 days to be exact) and then will be murdered by the anti-Christ himself. The two messengers are probably Elijah and Moses, but not everyone agrees. God will resurrect them and take them to heaven after their physical bodies are desecrated for 3 days.

Then, the Tribulation turns into the Great Tribulation and conditions will become worse. Try to get to Petra if you can.

The earth will begin to experience more natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods. Famine and plagues will also occur. There will specifically be a killer earthquake in Jerusalem. A giant meteor will hit the earth and strange astronomical events will also occur.

Expect the Great Tribulation to be hell on earth with wars and ethnic fighting. Lawlessness will be terrible. Christians will be persecuted and slaughtered for not joining a type of one-world religion pushed by the anti-Christ.

At the end of the seven year period of devastation on earth, Jesus will return in physical form. He will defeat the anti-Christ, but (this is in dispute) it might take another 1000 years for Satan to be defeated on earth.

If you have managed to be saved before this time, or before you are murdered because you are a Christian, you will then join me in heaven. If not, you will be cast into the pits of hell.

P.S. Please e-mail “my rapture letter” to all in my Yahoo mail contact list. Also, if my pets are still alive, please take care of them as long as you can. Thank you.

Apocalypse Again: Calculations Lead to 6.24.18: Includes Countdown Clock!